NCAA women's artistic gymnastics
Her scores, against every college lineup.
Log a meet. ChalkLine puts her event averages next to what each program's counting lineup actually scored, and shows the arithmetic behind every placement.
Two questions, answered separately and never added together: can she compete there, and would she want to be there.
A parent creates the account. Athletes join by invitation from their own parent — there is no open sign-up.
About 81 programs and roughly 250 incoming roster spots a year — the spreadsheet families build by hand, done properly.
Two questions, kept apart.
- Athletic fitCan she compete there?
- Her best rolling three-meet average on each event, set against that program's counting-lineup average and the lowest score that counted. The gap per event, the meets behind it, and the commits behind the class benchmark are all on the card.
- Feature 2 — Program Match
- Personal fitWould she want to be there?
- Thirteen questions she answers herself — distance from home, team size, academics, cost, the kind of coaching she wants. Her answers stay hers. A program we hold less data on is scored on fewer dimensions, and the page says which.
- Feature 3 — Fit profile
The two are never added together. A program can be a fine athletic fit and a miserable personal one, and a single blended number would hide exactly the tension worth seeing — as well as which half is fixable.
Where a program lands
- Wrong fitScores do not work yet · The place she asked forShe would like it here, but the scores do not work.
- Best betsShe can compete here · The place she asked forShe can compete here and it is the kind of place she asked for.
- NeitherScores do not work yet · Not the place she asked forThe scores do not work and it is not the kind of place she asked for.
- StretchShe can compete here · Not the place she asked forShe can compete here, but it is not the kind of place she asked for.
Four rails. One glance.
One rail per event. The grey block is that program’s counting lineup — from the lowest score that counted up to the lineup average. The amber tick is her average. Where the tick sits against the block is the whole answer.
Balance Beam is at or above the counting average; Uneven Bars is -0.125 against the counting average. Two glances, and you know which event is the work.
- at or above the counting average
- in the lineup range
- below the lineup range
- VT9.800
- UB9.700
- BB9.850
- FX9.825
Based on 3 meets, against 4 commits — under 5, so the real card marks this low confidence.
Illustration. These scores are made up — not a real athlete, and not a real program.
Seven features. Nothing else.
Everything below exists today. There is no waiting list, no coming-soon row, and no eighth thing behind a plan you have not bought.
- 1Score log
- Every meet, every event, three decimals, typed once or imported from a CSV.
- 2Program Match
- All ~81 programs bucketed by athletic fit — likely, target, reach, long shot — with the per-event math shown.
- 3Fit profile
- Thirteen questions she answers herself, turned into a personal-fit score per program.
- 4Discover
- Both axes on one board, ranked and filterable, with nothing added to her list unless she adds it.
- 5School list
- The programs she is actually tracking: coaching staff, roster, academics, cost, and where each fact came from.
- 6Outreach plans
- A per-school plan for staying in touch, with reminders and a calendar feed. ChalkLine never sends anything to a coach.
- 7Timeline
- The NCAA recruiting calendar keyed to her graduation year and the divisions she is looking at, each date linked to its published source.
Every number shows what it rests on.
- Each figure carries its sample: “based on 4 commits”, “3 meets in this average”. Four commits is thin, and the card says four rather than looking confident.
- A fact we do not hold is printed as a gap, not filled in. Missing academics lower how much of a program we claim to have scored — they never lower its score.
- Program benchmarks are best-effort and carry a source link and the date we last checked. Anything we checked more than 183 days ago is flagged as stale on the page that shows it.
- ChalkLine sends nothing to a coach, ever. There is no coach account, no messaging, and the database holds no coach email address to send one to.
ChalkLine is not affiliated with the NCAA and does not rule on eligibility. Recruiting dates are transcribed from published NCAA pages, each with a link and the date we last checked it.
Built for 13-to-18-year-olds first.
The account belongs to a parent. Her questionnaire answers are hers and are not shared by default. There is no public profile, no athlete-to-athlete or athlete-to-coach contact, and no analytics, ad, or session-replay code on any page of this site — including this one.
Start with one meet.
Three meets is where the match engine has enough to say anything, and it says so plainly until then rather than guessing.